Drones and Live-Streams: How Tech Is Changing Conservation
June 7th, 2021
Via BBC, a report on the impact of drones and live-streams in conservation:
Drones, satellites and laser sensors. It sounds like the tech of an action-packed spy thriller.
Not things you might typically associate with protecting animals.
According to a report by the World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF), the planet’s wildlife population has plummeted by 68% since 1970, with threats including things like poaching and loss of habitat.
But around the world, animal conservation has now evolved so it’s not just rangers and anti-poaching groups monitoring the wildlife of our world.
So just how is technology helping to modernise animal conservation?
The most recent eye-catching example of technological innovation can be found in the Balule Nature Reserve in South Africa, part of the huge Kruger National Park.
Camera phones mounted in protective cases streamed images of animals to people worldwide.
Thousands, sat comfortably at home, became virtual rangers with this anti-poaching pilot project, Wildlife Watch, by Balule, Samsung and Africam.
Viewers were able to report suspicious activity – things like seeing fence lines cut or hearing gunshots – and alert rangers to the possibility of poachers and trapped animals needing rescue.
For Leitah Mkhabela, a member of the park’s all-female anti-poaching unit known as The Black Mambas, creative use of technology can make a big difference.
“The live-stream is a great tool that helps us monitor even more areas in real time. The public helps us with watching and listening for anything suspicious,” the 28-year-old tells Radio 1 Newsbeat.
She describes one such incident.
“People saw something, suspected it and then reported it. When we went, a lion was freezing and the first line of the fence was broken.”
“Once poachers become aware that there could be more cameras in the bushes, they’ll be worried as we have so many eyes monitoring.
“It will definitely help chase them out.”
And this live-stream isn’t the only innovation.
“There are people on every continent in different environments using every sort of technology,” Stephanie O’Donnell tells Newsbeat.
Stephanie is from the Fauna & Flora International (FFI) conservation group and leads the Wild Labs programme, a project aimed at bringing conservation and tech together.
“We use acoustic devices which listen out for specific animal calls and tracking tags that monitor where animals are going and migrating.”
In Africa, the group is working closely with the Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya, which is home to the last northern white rhinos.
It’s not just about animals on land.
Big satellite, data-driven projects monitor deforestation and illegal fishing, with drones and underwater microphones being used to try and understand the behaviour of endangered whales.
“One of the big challenges for conservationists is manually going through millions of bits of images and data by hand to analyse them,” Stephanie says.
But that’s where Wildlife Insights comes in – an artificial intelligence project between organisations such as WWF, ZSL and Google.
“You can upload camera images and have machine-learning automatically identify what species are in there and analyse their data.”
For Leitah of The Black Mambas, all of these methods are a welcome change.
“In the beginning, we had to work with a pen, notebook and GPS to document the information we found.”
“But technology is getting better each year. Now we enter data into an app, which lets us send information quickly and directly to our operations room.
“So we can monitor teams in the field in real time and it helps with fast decision-making when suspicious activity is found.”
Stephanie says it’s also about using technology the right way, something people learn over time after the initial hype of a particular type of technology being “used for everything”.
Things like camera traps and drones have been around for a while, but only in recent years has it been figured out “how to apply them effectively”.
“And that’s things like rapid response to poaching incursions or providing communication photography, ground surveys and tracking.”
The future
Leitah feels greater technology and initiatives like live-streaming can help fill a big gap.
“Think about classrooms and teachers. When they are busy teaching, they can use 15 minutes of their time to go live and watch the reserve, whether they are in South Africa or not.”
“Kids in classrooms, people at home can help us have more eyes and ears in the reserve, watching and detecting.”
Stephanie says using long-lasting technology is incredibly important.
“We need technology to withstand really challenging conditions. Sometimes it needs to be out in the field for years; for example an animal tracking collar on a rhino needs to last five years because there’s always risk in too much intervention.”
“It’s not a silver bullet, it’s not going to solve everything, but it can have a really big impact for conservation,” she adds.
,
Read More »The Internet of Wild Things: Technology and The Battle Against Biodiversity Loss and Climate Change
March 21st, 2021
Via TechRepublic, a look at the use of technology in the battle against biodiversity loss and climate change:
The potential to install a regime of benign surveillance over the natural world is immense, ranging from earth-observation satellites to smartphones listening out for chain saws in the forest.
The interrelated issues of biodiversity loss and climate change are rising fast up the popular and political agenda. One reason is that the world increasingly appears to be — on fire.
In August 2019, wildfires — many started deliberately — consumed large areas of Amazonian rainforest, reducing the Earth’s ‘lung capacity’, rendering indigenous people and wildlife homeless, and releasing copious amounts of greenhouse gases. In September, on the other side of the world, forests in Indonesian Borneo and Sumatra burned. Again, human agency is widely suspected, as palm oil planters clear the jungle to make way for their crop. Massive bushfires are currently raging in eastern Australia, which experienced its hottest recorded summer in 2018/19.
Wildfires are also occurring in the far North with increasing frequency and intensity: in June 2019 (the hottest on record in the region), fires in the Arctic emitted 50 megatons of carbon dioxide — equivalent to the total annual CO2 output from Sweden. Evidence that Arctic permafrost is melting faster than previously expected only exacerbates the carbon release problem.
Why is the world apparently fiddling while Rome burns?
The tendency for national governments to have a short-term focus, addressing immediate problems and deferring longer-term issues for successive administrations or generations, is not helpful when confronting planet-scale problems like climate change and biodiversity loss. That’s because incremental ‘business-as-usual’ activities can run into irreversible tipping points that flip systems unexpectedly into new and undesirable states (the Amazon being an increasingly urgent example).
Although supranational bodies such as the UN and the EU try to take a wider view of such issues, recent years have seen a rise in nationalism around the world, leading to suspicion and even rejection of such bodies, often accompanied by the denigration of scientific evidence and expertise.
The Internet of Things, or IoT, is an area of science and technology that can help in the fight against biodiversity loss and climate change. In this article we’ll outline the current state of the IoT and examine some examples of its use in vulnerable ecosystems.
,
Read More »New Platform Aims to Reveal Dam and Climate Impacts on the Mekong
March 16th, 2021
Via The Third Pole, a look at a new platform which provides satellite imagery, maps and data which will show effects of dam building and climate change in the Mekong basin:
new monitoring platform that uses satellite imagery to track dam reservoir levels on the Mekong can shed light on the contentious issue of how the river’s precious water is stored, and the effects of climate change.
The disruption to water and sediment flows along the river resulting from the proliferation of dams “is causing the Mekong to die a death of a thousand cuts,” said Brian Eyler, director of the Stimson Centre’s Southeast Asia Programme.
He said the Mekong Dam Monitor, launched by the Stimson Center, promises to improve water resource management in the region and help researchers document changes to the climate.
Up to 60 million people depend on the Mekong for food and livelihoods. The 4,350-kilometre waterway originates in China, where it is known as the Lancang, before flowing through Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam.
Dams, roads worsened Himalayan flood impact manifold
China has built 11 hydropower dams, and 19 more are slated for construction. Along the full length of the Mekong and its tributaries, at least 102 dams impede flow according to the Stimson Center’s Mekong Infrastructure Tracker. This is significant because, in the dry season, as much as 70% of the water in the downstream Mekong comes from China.
Understanding the effects of climate change
As well as tracking reservoir levels, the Mekong Dam Monitor uses satellite imagery to reveal the “surface wetness” – relative wetness or dryness – of different parts of the basin. This provides information on how the dams affect river flow.
Eyler said the new tool provides data on melt rates in the snow-covered portions of the river’s upstream reaches. Researchers can combine data from the monitor with that from Eyes on Earth, a US-based consulting company that uses satellite images to address climate issues. The company, a partner of the Stimson Centre, is approaching 30 years of continuous satellite monitoring to understand climate change.
“To find climate change effects in the Mekong Basin, a user of the Mekong Dam Monitor could start with the climate anomaly maps which start in 1992 and run through the present day,” said Eyler. The maps show wetness, temperature, precipitation and snowmelt.
The two most apparent factors of climate change are general trends and variations of extreme events, according to Alan Basist, president of Eyes on Earth. He added that as the most pronounced impacts of climate change have become evident in the last 30 years, their data “provides a meaningful period of record to identify significant trends in surface wetness, surface temperature or snow cover”.
“The other feature we can monitor, which directly relates to climate change, is the variation in extreme events and their frequency,” Basist said, citing the Tonle Sap lake as an example of an area where the frequency of severe drought is changing.
A study released by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) in December 2019 suggested the gravest threat to the Mekong delta in Vietnam, much like the Tonle Sap lake, is sediment starvation caused by upstream dams, rather than rising seas.
Gary Lee, Southeast Asia program director at International Rivers, said climate change and large-scale dams on the Mekong mainstream and tributaries make the river’s flows and water levels unpredictable.
“Large dams upstream are significantly reducing the amount of sediment reaching the Mekong delta, with major impacts on soil fertility, rice and agricultural production and fisheries, which provide significant sources of income and livelihoods for millions of people living in the delta,” he said.
According to a Mekong River Commission study, modelling on the current and planned Mekong dams finds that sediment reduction could be as high as 97% by 2040. This advisory body includes Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand.
“The Tonle Sap is dying because of Mekong dams that prevent water from reaching the lake,” said Cambodian-American Sophal Ear, associate professor of diplomacy and world affairs at Occidental College, Los Angeles.
“We all know how much protein from fish in the Tonle Sap means to Cambodians, and yet there’s seemingly no recognition that the dams are collapsing catches.”
China has repeatedly claimed that its dams prevent droughts and flooding and do not negatively affect the lower Mekong. In October, China agreed to release year-round water data through the Mekong River Commission from two hydropower stations.
“The positive benefits of upstream Lancang river hydropower on downstream Mekong neighbours are clear and obvious,” said the China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute in a December report.
River of rhetoric
Severe droughts have stripped away fishing and farming communities’ livelihoods in lower Mekong nations in recent years. In response, China has been called on to offer transparent information about its dams.
Eyes on Earth published a study in April 2020 claiming that Chinese dams along the Mekong held back water during life-threatening periods of drought caused by the monsoon’s failure in 2019.
In response, the Mekong River Commission said the report did not “provide robust scientific evidence that the storing of water in Chinese reservoirs caused the exceptionally low flows in the LMB [Lower Mekong Basin] at Vientiane in 2019 and 2020”. Another group of researchers made a similar criticism, arguing that data was being overinterpreted for political ends.
During Cambodia’s monsoon months, the river swells, expanding the Tonle Sap lake to five times its dry-season levels, depriving it of nourishing sediment that forms its ecosystem’s foundation. Consequently, fish breeding plummets and the communities lining the lake’s shore struggle to survive.
In early 2020, Vietnam suffered the double blow of drought and saltwater intrusion into its Mekong delta provinces. Fishing and agricultural communities were devastated by the loss of crops and drinking water contamination. A December report, coordinated by Vietnam’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said 1.3 million people fled the area over fears of natural disasters such as droughts.
A paradox in China’s energy machine
China’s state media has claimed that upstream dam regulations are beneficial to downstream countries because they reduce monsoonal floods and release water during the dry season. Eyler said there is “no evidence that these restrictions or releases are beneficial to the region”.
“No stakeholders downstream are calling for such regulation,” he said. “In fact, we’ve heard from dam operators downstream whose operations are impacted by upstream restrictions, and this is affecting their profit margins.”
Eyler added that the new monitoring tool provides evidence that “China’s upstream dam operations are purely coordinated and optimised for the purpose of producing a maximum amount of hydropower at a time when the price of electricity is high in China.”
Cecilia Han Springer, a senior researcher with the Global China Initiative at Boston University’s Global Development Policy Centre, said upstream impoundment has severe effects on downstream countries’ ability to manage their water.
However, Springer is more focussed on Mekong dams outside China. She has so far identified over 1,000 hydropower stations – on both the mainstream Mekong and its many tributaries – in lower Mekong countries, including a profusion of smaller hydropower projects involving Thai and Chinese developers. There are 11 mainstream dams in various stages of planning or completion on the Lower Mekong. The Nam Ou, a vital river that feeds the Mekong, has seven dams, all with Chinese construction or development involvement.
She says it’s difficult to parse the effects of climate change from smaller hydropower projects. Still, a recent paper looking at emissions from reservoirs in the Mekong region found some, including for hydropower projects, release greenhouse gas emissions on a par with some fossil fuel plants.
,
Read More »Digitized Data Conserves Africa’s Great Lake Fisheries
February 13th, 2021
Via Nature, a look at how digitized data is helping conserves Africa’s Great Lake fisheries:
Africa’s Great Lakes stretch in an 1,800-mile curve of 11 countries from Ethiopia in the north to Malawi in the south, encompassing a region rich in biodiversity with nearly a third of the world’s fresh surface water and supporting the livelihoods of 80 million Africans.
The natural bounty the seven lakes provide to both people and planet is under threat. Increasing human populations eking a living from the land in areas of deep poverty are driving rapid and often unplanned development that has major environmental impacts on the lakes, their habitat and resources.
At the heart of the lakes’ economies are their fisheries. They hold the highest diversity of freshwater species of ecological, economic, and scientific importance on Earth, with at least 2,500 fish species, predominantly endemic cichlids.
On Lake Victoria, the largest by surface area, some 200,000 fishers catch in the region of one million tonnes of fish a year, driving businesses that support a further four million people to earn a living.
Already, stocks of many large commercially-important species have declined or even collapsed from over-fishing and environmental degradation. For example, due to historic commercial fishing, the three largest Lates (perch) species are rarely caught today on Lake Tanganyika.
Villagers bring in their catch of daaga, a kind of sardine on the shores of Lake Tanganyika. © Ami Vitale / TNC
Written on the Beach
To stop the same happening to the stocks that remain, authorities need affordable ways to keep track of what is happening with fish catches across all seven lakes: Albert, Edward, Kivu, Tanganyika, Turkana, Victoria, and Malawi, also known as Lake Nyasa and Lake Niassa.Historically, gathering and analysing data from the lakes was a costly, time-consuming process fraught with risks of human error warping results, says Innocent Sailale, senior data systems analyst for the Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute (TAFIRI). The Institute produces regular reports on the country’s fisheries sector to support policy-making by the national Fisheries Department in the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism.
“It was all manual, all on paper,” Mr. Sailale says. “Data from the fishers was written down at the beach, it would get wet and you struggle to read it later. The papers piled up and were stored somewhere until the scientists came from the Institute or the Ministry to collect them, and they sometimes couldn’t be found. People could even fill out fake data sitting at their home not ever going to the beach. Data entry errors were common.”
If scientists or the government wanted new research, a team would need to travel to the lake to update the enumerators on the information they would need to collect. These trips cost too much for strapped ministry budgets, meaning new science that could have informed smart policies never got off the ground in time.
Lake Tanganyika holds nearly one-fifth of the world’s freshwater and is home to 250 endemic species of fish. © Ami Vitale / TNC
Even problems identified in the data that were captured were sometimes only noticed months later when the manual forms were collected and transported to the labs, painstakingly entered into computer spreadsheets, and analysed.“You come to understand the issue when it’s already too late, or become something else,” Mr. Sailale says.
What this all meant was that the authorities tasked with sustaining the economic and ecological resources of Africa’s Great Lakes were in many cases flying blind.
“If you inadequately monitor these fisheries resources, successful and sustainable management cannot take place in a timely manner,” says Dr. Richard Ogutu-Ohwayo, who has studied and worked on Africa’s Great Lakes for over 40 years and is currently the Executive Director of AFLANET, the African Lakes Network.
“Inadequate monitoring has partly contributed to the decline in fish stocks. Availability of catch and effort data is critical in sustainable fisheries management, and it requires good, timely, and affordable. E-CAS was developed to achieve that.”
TNC’s Peter Limbu, James Anton and Sadoki Nfukamo look at and measure fish. © Ami Vitale / TNC
Capture the Data
E-CAS stands for Electronic Catch Assessment Survey. It is a digital data capture and analysis system run through an Android app loaded to mobile phones where data is collected and sent in real time to a cloud database accessible by stakeholders for instant analysis and reporting.It was developed to monitor the fisheries in the Tanzanian waters of Lake Tanganyika with a $110,000 grant from the African Great Lakes Conservation Fund, administered by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) with a $500,000 donation from the John D. and Katherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
The Fund was launched in 2017 at the African Great Lakes Conference in Entebbe, Uganda, the first major technical, scientific, political, and development gathering for the region’s freshwater lakes in more than 20 years. TNC was the lead organizer for this conference.
The MacArthur Foundation grant provided catalytic support under the African Great Lakes conservation fund to implement some of the key recommendations from the Conference, following on its support for the conference itself.
Alongside e-CAS, the Fund supported a regional online information platform; regional policy and research coordination workshops through the African Center for Aquatic Research and Education (ACARE); a compendium of best management practices for in-lake caged aquaculture; and a program to reduce sedimentation through sustainable land use management in Rwanda and Burundi.
Lake Tanganyika provides 40% of all protein for lakeshore villages. © Ami Vitale / TNC
“The success of the African Great Lakes Conference demonstrated an enthusiasm for regional coordination and problem solving, but there was a clear gap in facilitating this to happen,” says Colin Apse, Africa Freshwater Conservation Director for TNC.“The African Great Lakes Conservation Fund helped to fill some of the gap in sharing and developing best practice to benefit the environment and developing economies in and around the lakes, and the resources the lakes hold.”
The electronic fish catch assessment system is already having a significant impact, and is set to be expanded to other great lakes, says Dr. Ogutu-Ohwayo, who has worked closely with TNC’s Africa Great Lakes Initiative.
“E-CAS has really simplified how we do business in the fisheries sector, and it’s helping us a lot,” he says. “It speeds up the availability of data. It leaves scientists in the laboratory analysing data and advising managers, not travelling all the time to and from the field. It cleans the data as it’s generated, removing unnecessary errors. It’s instantly updated as improvements are developed or new research requirements are identified.”
Already, the authorities using e-CAS report the cost of monitoring fish catches has dropped by 70% since the system was introduced. Managers are able to plan amendments to policies or guidelines using the most up-to-date information.
© Hillary Mrosso
Those data can also be shared with the national authorities or partners including donors to help refine development funding to the fisheries sector so it is as effective as it can be.Just as important is that e-CAS involves people at all levels, from the central government all the way down the chain to the fishers on the lakes, says Dr Hillary Mrosso, Senior Research Officer at TAFIRI who worked with TNC to pilot e-CAS in Tanzania.
“It solves problems the scientists faced, but it also helps the communities,” says Dr. Mrosso. “The data comes right from the hands of the fishermen, and the system can feed back to them and authorised people at different levels. Analysis can be produced without having to wait for a national or regional report, even eventually to the village level so they would be able to tell what they’re catching and set up their plans on the basis of such kinds of data.”
The system works like this. Enumerators are picked from the fishing communities – usually fishers with a role in the local Beach Management Unit (BMU) – or from the district authorities. The e-CAS app is loaded to mobile phones running the Android operating system. Its simple interface encourages easy data entry.
Four groups of data are collected. First, where the fish were caught and where the catch was brought ashore. The handsets are GPS-enabled, and automatically record the location where data was collected making this information precise and impossible to fake.
Second, details of the fishing boat: What shape and size is it? Is it oar-powered or does it have an engine? Inboard or outboard? What size engine? How many crew are onboard?
Then, data on the fishing gear and equipment: what number and type of nets? What lines, and hooks? Was the gear used in a stationary fishing site or was it drifting?
Finally, measurements on the catch itself: what species of fish and what weight of each, and what was their estimated value either if they were sold where they were landed, or were due to be transported and sold elsewhere?
Kibuyi eCAS enumerators at work © Hillary Mrosso
Fishers feel a greater sense of ‘owning’ their fisheries, Dr. Mrosso says, when they are actively engaged in collecting the data and then see the results of the analysis.“Take an example of the fisher at the grass roots, they may not have understood, ‘Why should I not go out beach seining, for example, or use a monofilament’, because they don’t see the impact in tangible terms,” he says.
“But with this system they can look at the trends in their own village, and see, ‘when we changed our behaviour in this direction or the other, what happened’? They can see, ‘in the years when we had so many under-sized gill nets, or so many monofilaments, which are destructive, what was the pattern in our catches?’. It has quite a huge impact.”
Using the African Great Lakes Conservation Fund grant and working with TNC through the Tuungane Project, e-CAS was first launched in Tanzania on Lake Tanganyika and the country’s marine coast. The German government’s international development agency GIZ then expanded e-CAS to Lake Victoria, encompassing Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda.
In Tanzania, 299 people have been trained to collect, store, and analyse e-CAS data. In Kenya and Uganda, 28 system administrators, managers, and supervisors have been trained. The system is being introduced to other African Great lakes such as Albert and Edward.
The goal now, Dr. Ogutu-Ohwayo says, is to expand the system even further. “The issues facing the Great Lakes are essentially the same,” he says. “Here we have a system that is very flexible, it is digital, it can be updated how we want, and it has already expanded from where it started on Lake Tanganyika and now is in Lake Victoria and other lakes such as Albert and Edward.
“It can also be adapted in other fisheries data collections systems such as frame surveys. Next it should go to all the Great Lakes to bring its benefits to each of them as well and developed for other fisheries management data collection.”
,
Read More »Better Data, Cheaper Tech Promise to Unlock Nature’s Secrets
February 8th, 2021
Via The Wall Street Journal, an article on how conservationists hope newly launched open-source tools will lend more insight into endangered species and the effects of climate change:
Cameroon’s Dja Faunal Reserve is one of the largest undisturbed areas in Africa. Elephants trample through the trees, monkeys call to one another, and insects hum, all with barely any human interference. The lack of roads and dense forest have protected the biodiversity there, but the same remoteness has left the impact of climate change on the area little understood. Instead of trying to set up camp for a few weeks at a time, researchers are turning to tools they hope will gather data delicately and indefinitely.
“So often the science stops when you leave these places,” says Shah Selbe, a former rocket scientist and the co-founder of FieldKit, a Los Angeles nonprofit building open-source tools to gather conservation data. “If we can create low-cost tools that make monitoring easier, we can start to get more data.”
Big Data has transformed industries from finance to drug discovery. Conservationists, however, haven’t had the same access to deep data sets because of the difficulty and cost involved in gathering data in the wilderness.
To help, startups are developing open-source technology built to monitor the environment, from equipment that records the sounds of the forest to devices that collect data on weather conditions. The hope is that open-source tech will make it cheap enough to gather data. In turn, the data could lend greater insights into where to focus efforts to save endangered species and tackle the effects of climate change.
The open-source movement advocates sharing design information so that anyone can inspect and improve upon the tools that are built. Often, the groups behind the tech are nonprofits, typically resulting in hardware and software that are cheaper than commercial counterparts. Researchers can adapt the tools without worrying about breaking a user agreement or warranty. With more adaptable tools, projects could range from learning about a single species to ecosystems as large as the polar regions.
FieldKit makes a water-resistant device about the size of a coffee-table book that allows users to gather data on water temperature, weather conditions, pH levels and more. Launched this month, the $150 device includes a computer chip that can accommodate a variety of environmental sensors and add-ons, which run $50 to $205 each. FieldKit also offers two prebuilt models, one for water quality and another for weather conditions. A prebuilt model for air-quality is coming soon. Prices include a small margin to support Conservify, FieldKit’s parent nonprofit, which currently relies on grants to fund its operations.
The units were built to withstand environments from rainforests to freezing tundra, and to collect data for weeks or even months at a time, says Mr. Selbe. He expects that many users will be full-time researchers affiliated with nonprofits or universities, but he says it was important to sell prebuilt kits to expand the potential audience to students and individuals without technical backgrounds.
“You can take the FieldKit out of the box, download the app, and be monitoring in five minutes,” he says.
FieldKit’s website hosts the data collected on the devices. Mr. Selbe says that he hopes that most researchers will put their data on the platform, enabling even researchers and enthusiasts without FieldKits to use it. There is an option to disguise location information to protect endangered species or sensitive locations, Mr. Selbe says.
Much of the conservation technology builds on open-source tools made for more general uses, such as Raspberry Pi’s simple, single-board computer chips and Tensorflow, Google’s machine-learning platform. These advances have been essential for the cash-strapped environmental research community, says Alasdair Davies, co-founder of the Arribada Initiative, a nonprofit that builds open-source technology with partners who require technical expertise.
“We are riding the wave going on in the commercial space and repurposing it for conservation,” Mr. Davies says.
More devices in the field mean more data, but analyzing all of it can prove impossible for solo researchers and small teams. Citizen scientists have volunteered to label, transcribe or otherwise organize data on scores of different projects, including labeling wildlife caught on camera in a New York forest and transcribing old weather logs from the U.S. Navy. Some research even requires volunteers, such as Arribada’s Carnivore Bytes project, which aims to learn more about wild dogs in part by gathering data on people’s pets.
Carnivore Bytes in January sent recording devices that clip onto collars to hundreds of dog owners. With an app, volunteers note when their dogs are doing things like panting, playing or eating. Eventually, the data is meant to help train an algorithm to go through wild-dog noises for insights into how climate change is impacting their lives. For example, wild dogs making fewer eating noises could suggest that prey is scarce and hunger is becoming an issue.
Open Acoustic Devices, based in the U.K., sells acoustic recording devices called AudioMoths for $60, compared with hundreds or thousands of dollars for a commercial version. Since launching in 2018, AudioMoth has sold about 20,000 units, according to co-founder Andy Hill. The sales, along with occasional work building custom software to go along with AudioMoth projects, allow Mr. Hill and another founder to work on the technology full-time, he says.
AudioMoths have been used to record thousands of hours of sound. In one project, researchers are recording marine mammal vocalizations in an effort to decode the different sounds that dolphins, manatees and whales use to communicate. Mr. Hill estimates that projects have, on average, used 10 to 100 AudioMoths, which has greatly improved the quality and quantity of data.
“Without open-source technology, you are going to be limited to one-species studies with one device,” he says. “That hasn’t really gotten us anywhere when it comes to conservation.”
Open-source technology is also allowing more people to engage in environmental research, says Lydia Gibson, an ecologist and National Geographic explorer who uses it in her fieldwork.
Still, conservation isn’t just about technology, she says. It is also about the people who use the tools and the local communities that participate, actively or not. Conservation has gotten better about including more voices and respecting local expertise, and those strides can’t be lost as shiny new tools are added to research tool kits, Ms. Gibson says.
“A focus on technology needs to include a holistic view of how it’s used,” she says. “Technology on its own is not the solution.”
,
Read More »Elephants Counted From Space for Conservation
January 21st, 2021
Via BBC, a report on the use of satellites in conservation:
At first, the satellite images appear to be of grey blobs in a forest of green splotches – but, on closer inspection, those blobs are revealed as elephants wandering through the trees.
And scientists are using these images to count African elephants from space.
The pictures come from an Earth-observation satellite orbiting 600km (372 miles) above the planet’s surface.
The breakthrough could allow up to 5,000 sq km of elephant habitat to be surveyed on a single cloud-free day.
And all the laborious elephant counting is done via machine learning – a computer algorithm trained to identify elephants in a variety of backdrops.
“We just present examples to the algorithm and tell it, ‘This is an elephant, this is not an elephant,'”Dr Olga Isupova, from the University of Bath, said.
“By doing this, we can train the machine to recognise small details that we wouldn’t be able to pick up with the naked eye.”
The scientists looked first at South Africa’s Addo Elephant National Park.
“It has a high density of elephants,” University of Oxford conservation scientist Dr Isla Duporge said.
“And it has areas of thickets and of open savannah.
“So it’s a great place to test our approach.
“While this is a proof of concept, it’s ready to go.
“And conservation organisations are already interested in using this to replace surveys using aircraft.”
Conservationists will have to pay for access to commercial satellites and the images they capture.
But this approach could vastly improve the monitoring of threatened elephant populations in habitats that span international borders, where it can be difficult to obtain permission for aircraft surveys.
‘Cutting-edge techniques’
The scientists say it could also be used in anti-poaching work.“And of course, [because you can capture these images from space,] you don’t need anyone on the ground, which is particularly helpful during these times of coronavirus,” Dr Duporge said.
“In zoology, technology can move quite slowly.
“So being able to use the cutting-edge techniques for animal conservation is just really nice.”
,
Read More »